2020 has been a year of accelerating change – the rapid adoption and expansion of telehealth tools is proof of that. Will 2021 be the year that progress toward population health breaks out of its recent rut?
In a recent survey of 2,000 U. S. adults, 65% said they liked using telehealth because of its convenience, and because of that, 51% that they’d continue using it after Covid-19.
The recent ruling on the Transparency in Coverage rule brings consumers one step closer to a world in which they will know the price of a hospital service/procedure in advance, rather than weeks or even months after the fact.
Addressing social determinants of health is an excellent way to deliver value-based care, and it’s exactly what is needed to make sure we aren’t so desperately searching for cures another 250 years from now.
The biggest barrier to moving toward a value-based at-risk model has been executives’ fear of potential loss if they move away from fee-for-service. But the coronavirus has taught us that the potential for loss in fee-for-service is bottomless.
The experience of coronavirus should be a wake-up call that the future of healthcare and the well-being of the nation depend on our willingness to invest in a new model.
One of the outcomes of the pandemic may be greater tolerance for and an appreciation of the anxiety associated with uncertainty. Normalizing this would help bridge the gulf that has long existed between the realm of physical and emotional health.
Against the backdrop of the health crisis caused by the coronavirus and the ensuing economic crisis triggered by efforts to contain the spread of it, could there be a silver lining?
During times of change and uncertainty blanket innuendos by nationally recognized news outlets don’t help us address the problems in front of us. Instead, they undermine confidence in our healthcare institutions.