Applying the Pareto principle to our nation’s coronavirus response offers a much safer and more effective set of solutions, maximizing the lives saved while ensuring the “cure” isn’t worse than the disease itself.
There will come a day when the greatest threat from the COVID-19 is not medical, but financial. How the United States navigates the coronavirus recession will depend largely on the government policies enacted now.
As states hammer out plans to ease restrictions, Americans remain chronically misinformed about the coronavirus. These three facts are key to ensuring the safe reopening of businesses and schools.
Scientists and health officials understand the transmissibility and lethality of COVID-19 very well. Why then do investors appear completely flustered by the disease?
The nation’s largest hospital systems have remained curiously quiet concerning a recent proposal from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to “support seamless and secure access, exchange, and use of electronic health information.”
Because tech companies too often fail to prioritize human needs over business interests, medicine’s most-hyped AI applications have failed, repeatedly, to move the needle on public health, patient safety or healthcare costs.
Hospitals administrators and national association groups have defended past mergers by promising the deals will lower costs and improve patient care. They almost never do.
In healthcare, the past is a reliable predictor of the future. And when you look at key performance measures—such as cost, quality and satisfaction—it’s clear that U.S. healthcare underperformed over the last decade.